Example 1 Descriptive writing
This is a short example of descriptive writing from an essay on film history and a specific exhibition:
'The first juxtaposition is between One Week and Gordon Matta-Clark's Splitting (1974) One Week tells the story of a newly married couple making their first home, and Buster Keaton plays the husband who builds the flat packed house. The twenty-five minutes flows with a series of predictable accidents, such as Keaton sawing a piece of wood on the roof whilst sitting on the end he is cutting away, he falls and simply carries on. There are two key moments of destruction: firstly the storm which causes the completed house to spin out of control, whilst the couple and their guests are in it; and secondly a train running through the house (when the couple try to move it to it's correct plot)'
(Postgraduate student. Essay, 2014. Very slightly adapted and used with permission)
The paragraph describes some incidents in a film. That’s fine, but to carry more weight and to satisfy the marker, the essay will also need some critical writing. Now here is a short example of critical writing from the same essay.
Example 2 Critical writing
'Some caution is required when using slapstick as an interpretive method. Keaton engineered films for comic effect, and as alluded to earlier, it is unlikely that he was seeking to intentionally challenge convention, or leave his audiences with thoughts of failure and the futility of life. As Bal and Bryson (1991) state, an evaluation of context can reveal what the work is supposed to be. Keaton's films were not intended as art, nor as a lens through which to view contemporary art. Further, it is unknown whether all of the artists' works exhibited are directly influenced by any of the Keaton films shown. However, O'Doherty's notion that, 'ideas are more interesting than art' is useful to articulate the idea that Keaton's processes have generated ideas for the curators (O'Doherty, 1999). Slapstick's historical context should not prevent its processes from being used as an interpretative approach; and as Dillon's theses suggests (2007), there is much to be gained from applying them.
(Postgraduate student. Essay, 2014. Used with permission)
In this paragraph, by contrast with Example 1, the writer suggests their own interpretation, relates the filmmaker’s work to critical theorists, and clearly presents themselves as being a member of an academic community. See for instance the phrases ‘slapstick’s historical context’ and ‘there is much to be gained by applying it.’ Both these indicate a level of academic confidence and of comfort within the subject discipline of film studies.